Else's 1986 (p. 159) claims that most interpretations of Aristotle assert he requires some form of pity, fear, and catharsis to be produced in audiences. Because most of these interpretations do not explicitly address the question we aim to answer in this paper, there is some risk of misinterpreting most Aristotle commentators as supporting the position we oppose. However, the overall impression is so strong that we confidently refer to this view as the "common" interpretation. As an analysis of tragedy, the common interpretation is unsatisfactory. It is well-known that people's emotional reactions to the events they witness or hear about depend on their emotional states at the time. If Aristotle truly believed certain emotional responses in audiences were necessary for tragedy, or good tragedy, he would have dedicated at least some pages to preparing people so that exposure to dramatic tragedy would effectively arouse the correct emotions. This Aristotle does not do.
Take Materials: Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Francis Bacon, Feminist Fiction, Master's Degree English, English Literature, Victorian Age, First Tragedy in English, and Literary Criticism.