Skip to main content

The Battle of The Books: Short Satire - Jonathan Swift

"The Battle of the Books" is a short satire written by Jonathan Swift and published as part of the prolegomena to his A Tale of a Tub in 1704. It depicts a literal battle between books in the King's Library (housed in St James's Palace at the time of the writing), as ideas and authors struggle for supremacy. Because of the satire, "The Battle of the Books" has become a term for the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. This literary contest was re-enacted in miniature in England when Sir William Temple published an answer to Fontenelle entitled Of Ancient and Modern Learning in 1690.

The prose is a parody of heroic poetry along the lines of Samuel Butler's parody of battle in Hudibras.As a set piece or topos of 18th-century satire, the "Battle of the Books" was a standard shorthand for both the Quarrel of the Ancients and Moderns and the era of Swift's battle with William Wotton. The Royal Society of London was founded in 1660 and played a key role in promoting the ideas of the Scientific Revolution. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 had led to significant changes in government and the balance of power, and Swift's writings often reflected his concerns about political and social issues.

The story begins that "Ancients, complaining of a great nuisance; how the height of that part of Parnassus quite spoiled the prospect of theirs, especially towards the east." These living books engage in heated debates about their respective merits and the overall value of their content. The "Ancients" represent the classical authors, whose works have been revered for centuries, while the "Moderns" are the contemporary authors who believe their works have surpassed the classics.

Swift introduces us to two prominent characters in this literary battle: the spider and the bee. The spider, "swollen up to the first magnitude by the destruction of infinite numbers of flies". The bee, symbolizing the Moderns, "acquitted himself of his toils, and, posted securely at some distance, was employed in cleansing his wings, and disengaging them from the ragged remnants of the cobweb." The absurdity of the situation highlights the futility of such arguments, as intellectual debates should not be resolved through violence. 

Swift uses this humorous conflict to underscore the pointlessness of the Ancients vs. Moderns debate. Throughout the battle, "in the modern side, William Wotton, Charles Boyle, and Sir William Temple, among others take part, and in the ancient side, Homer, Plato, Aristotle, and Virgil, among others. The modern books fire their pages like artillery, while the ancient books use their wisdom to counterattack. This battle, fought with absurdity and satire, serves as a commentary on the triviality of the dispute itself.

The battle is eventually interrupted by the goddess Pallas, symbolizing wisdom, who admonishes both sides for their senseless quarrel. Swift's message is clear: there is value in both the ancient and modern authors, and one should not dismiss either side of the literary debate. In the end, it is remained "Farewell, beloved, loving pair; few equals have you left behind: and happy and immortal shall you be, if all my wit and eloquence can make you". This reconciliation represents Swift's call for a balanced and respectful approach to literary history.

In the allegorical elements, The battle between the Ancients and the Moderns serves as an allegory for the broader intellectual and cultural conflicts of the time.Swift employs irony, parody, and absurdity throughout the essay to lampoon various intellectual figures and their arguments.The essay contains absurd and fantastical elements, such as books coming to life and engaging in a literal battle.The essay indirectly critiques the society of Swift's time by drawing parallels between the battles of books and the real-life debates and conflicts in the intellectual and cultural realms.

To conclude, in "The Battle of The Books" Swift offers valuable insights into human nature, the limitations of knowledge, and the necessity of intellectual humility. It represents a satirical portrayal of the debate between classical and contemporary literature. The allegory provokes thoughtful discussions about tradition, innovation, and the merits of different literary creations. The renowned 18th-century literary critic and lexicographer, Samuel Johnson, wrote extensively about Swift and his works, including "The Battle of the Books." His insights provide valuable historical context and analysis of Swift's writing.

Comments

Followers

Labels

Show more